Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] 11-dm-mpath.rules: don't save DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG_OLD
Martin Wilck <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:44:24 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lvm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9919fc46e19c5521281cba864f5299ffdbe87b9c.camel__2524.33359143964$1707583490$gmane$org@suse.com> |
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 21:17 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > Is z0-dm-mpath-last.rules the right way to name this? I'm a little > worried that something will expect a two-digit beginning to udev > rules > files, and a name like 99-z0-dm-mpath-last.rules would be more > appropriate (if even longer). Yeah, that's better perhaps. I had chosen 99-dm-mpath-late.rules first, but then I realized that there was 99-systemd.rules. '99-z-dm-mpath-late.rules' might look even nicer (and takes advantage of the fact that "-" is lexically sorted before all digits and letters). Thanks, Martin