Re: Re: .amd64 packages

Guillaume Rousse skrev:

> Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
>> That's AFAIK because Gwenole hasn't yet had much time to do anything 
>> about the x86_64 cooker contrib...
>>
>> or he may havee some of it already done, but not synced it to
>> the mirrors yet...
>>
>> IIRC he said he will be rebuid / clean it completely for 10.2
>
> May I remind that some contributers also proposed to do the job, and 
> even stated to do it, but were quickly rebuffed by difficulties to 
> access up-to-date packages first, and lack of consideration for their 
> work second (aka: do what you want, your packages will be silently 
> erased at the end) ?
>

Yeah, I seem to recall that... :-(

Hopefully that will change when the x86_&4 Cluster gets in place as 
noted here:
http://www.mandrakeclub.com/article.php?sid=3556

[Q/A]17

--
Regards

Thomas