Fwd: Re: [TLUG]: Flash player on x86_64?
Marc Lijour <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:32:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I got this email from a LUG list. A little comparison between Mandriva and Debian working. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Flash player on x86_64? Date: September 28, 2005 09:25 From: Len Sorensen <[email protected]> To: [email protected] On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Evan Leibovitch wrote: > Most things are working well on a newly installed Athlon 64 system (the > latest Ubuntu gave me install errors but Mandriva loaded without a > hitch...) > > I notice that Macromedia does not make a 64-bit version of Flash player > though they say it can be used on a 64-but OS using a 32-bit browser. > > It's my understanding that Firefox still runs in 32-bit mode, so it > should be able to satisfy the above requirement. Yet they Flash install > > script aborts, saying: > > ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not supported by the > > Macromedia Flash Player installer. > > Can I safely mangle the scripts to override this, or will the resulting > setup be unusable? Has anyone else tried this? > > In any case, how usable is the open source Flash player? Well if you run a debian based distribution, installing the flash package from marillat's archive in your 32bit chroot is simple and just works. If you want to install a 32bit only program while running a 64bit kernel you need the linux32 utility (which intercepts calls to uname for checking architecture and returns i686 instead of x86_64). So for example: bash# linux32 flashplayersetup Lennart Sorensen -- The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml -------------------------------------------------------