Re: Re: [REBUILD] dssi-0.9.1-3mdk.src.rpm from cooker does not build correctly on x86_64

On Sunday, 7 May 2006 16:30, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> s=F6ndag 07 maj 2006 16:45 skrev Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas:
> > After the whole set of packages are in contrib, there will be another
> > problem: Rosegarden is in main, while the dssi package is in contrib...
> > what can we do then?
>
> Hmmm,
> that's why the dssi is disabled in Rosearden as _no_ package in main is
> allowed to depend on contrib packages...

Well, Rosegarden was already in main years ago. DSSI is in Cooker since onl=
y a=20
few weeks ago. That's why we have troubles compiling it in x86_64.

> Now we need to check if the dssi is OK to be moved to main, and if so
> re-enable dssi support...

Or move Rosegarden to contrib, or create another Rosegarden-dssi package in=
=20
contrib with DSSI support (and everything else) enabled.

> > Well. At this point, I would like to ask why is it necessary to fullfill
> > all these details only in x86_64, if the same packages and the same spec
> > files are building OK in i586:
> > http://qa.mandriva.com/build/iurt/cooker/i586/log/status.contrib.log
> > (look for dssi, fluidsynth-dssi, xsynth-dssi and hexter in this report)
>
> It can be a bug in the autorequires checks that does not pick up correctly
> on x86_64...

Do you think it's time to open a bug report against... Which package, RPM?=
=20
Or is there anybody knowing about this issue, and thinking that it is =20
preferable to provide all the explicit dependencies in x86_64 that aren't=20
required in i586?

Regards,
Pedro