Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Kernel v3.1.6-1.2 (cooker only)
Alexander Kazancev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAqM-AcYZ8a5X8nFY_vhMkcPrUfrA7coiUrtC6ZAkt8sn=Gu6g@mail.gmail.com> |
2012/1/4 Franck Bui <[email protected]>: > Alexander Kazancev <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2012/1/3 Franck Bui <[email protected]>: >>> [email protected] writes: >>> >>>>> [email protected] writes: >> >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /me too now am happy with installing a 3.x kernel (did build the >>>>>> nvidia kernel driver cleanly). >>>>>> >>>>>> Only issue is that I still keep a computer where I did not >>>>>> "rpm -e --nodeps linux-userspace-headers" and apparently should >>>>>> be a rpm issue. Maybe if removing the epoch it would work... >>>>> >>>>> Well, I added the epoch previously otherwise urpmi still wanted to >>>>> install linux-userpsace-headers after installing kernel-headers on 2011. >>>>> >>>>> And AFAIK it works fine on 2011. >>>> >>>> I think it is the same issue I had with texlive-* providing some >>>> tetex-* packages. The only solution was to actually remove the >>>> tetex-* packages from repositories (they were broken, unmaintained >>>> and not installable anyway), because apparently a provides of an >>>> existing package would not work. It had and still has those >>>> provides to not break build requires of existing packages... >>> >>> I think we could remove the linux-userpsace-headers package as well, >>> this shouldn't hurt. >>> >>>> BTW, I noticed the 2.6.39 kernel installed as updates for 2011 >>>> has the same issue of 3.1.6-1.1 regarding to compiling kernel >>>> modules, due to missing linux/version.h, >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> That wasn't an issue previously but since the dkms package update, it >>> is. >>> >>>> and may have the other drakx* issue (it does not boot in an i586 I saw >>>> being updated). >>> >>> I need to see what's happening exactly here. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> -- >>> Franck >>> >> >> Some users sad on enable PAE. Some processor, like Centrino M not work >> with enabled PAE support. In older (from tmb) Mandriva kernel PAE (and >> HIGHMEM64) option was disabled for 32-bit kernels. May we need do this >> in new kernel or make another (desktop-nopae) packages? > > Try the "generic" kernel: > > $ urpmi kernel-generic > > Bye. > -- > Franck > Is kernel-generic has some features and improverments, like you kernel-desktop and what reason using PAE and HIGHMEM64G for 32-bit kernel? Now we have a ugly situation on 2011, like user install initial mandriva ISO with 2.6.38 kernel (it's no PAE in desktop version) and the update for 2.6.39 and not boot his system. It;s not correct. User say "you Mandriva is stupid and bad" oan migrate to Ubuntu :( May be we need diffirent flavour for kernel config? For kernel-desktop 32-bit with no-PAE and HIGHMEM4G, and for 64-bit such in nowday kernel. And has kernel-desktop-pae for users, that have using PAE on 32 bit. It's not more complex, but i think it's resolved more problem. -- Chief of educational programs Mandriva Russia (http://edumandriva.ru) Alexander Kazancev