Re: Don't update to current cooker

Jeffrey Johnson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jan 19, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:

> Hi,
> I've just updated perl to 5.14.2 - this breaks urpm until some related packages have been rebuilt, so it's not a good idea to update right now.
> 
> I'll send another mail when the rebuilds are done.
> 

Your message is appreciated as will be the follow-up.

(aside)
But how SHOULD large upgrades like perl/ruby be handled
in "real time" when Cooker breaks not for any important
reasons but because a large upgrade is in process?

libpng 1.5 was another example: weeks to sort out a
complex upgrade that (imho) need not have been
distributed until complete?

The cooker/rawhide model needs to change somehow.

One approach would be to "bundle" large upgrades
until ready. The problem there is that if two large
upgrades are "isolated" then when each is released
there will still be incompatibilities.

Another approach would be to delay cooker updates
to a weekly (instead of daily) time scale in order to
permit time to do some simple QA (or perhaps even compose
a minimal image like Franck is offering to do monthly).
A longer time scale also allows users to judge when
_NOT_ to upgrade if, say, the weekly release was Friday
and the weekend were used to clean up issues. (Friday
may or may not be the right day: but a weekly schedule
might allow some time so that end-of-week was higher
quality than beginning-of-week updates).

There's *got* to be a better process flow here imho: needless
(and endless) breakage is hard to keep up with.

hth

73 de Jeff
> ttyl
> bero
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.