Re: Re: Minimal snapshots for cooker available.
Matthew Dawkins <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:14:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJhHcZjMSgFNYLsFMuara2B3NnEwnC9QnWMhWhQZkS0yXRLHZg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Franck Bui <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew Dawkins <[email protected]> writes: > > [...] > > > > > What kmod is that? i have been checking the kernels ever since you > > mentioned it to me. > > I think I've already described how to get/use it somewhere else... > > > My main problem ATM are building solid initrd imgs and the unioning fs > > needed in the livecd. Currently the kernels are requiring mkinitrd and > > not dracut. > > If you can detail further maybe I could have a look and help. > > > We could drastically clean up what is needed in the initrd if we > > started migrating to dracut and a static busybox. > > Perhaps, but my goal was not to have the smallest image, but a snapshot > of current cooker ready to use in various context. > > -- > Franck > Well, maybe we can address one issue at a time. What would it take to get dracut to replace mkinitd? And I think dracut should prolly prefer the static busybox over the uclibc compile busybox.