Re: Overeager cleaning of -devel provides

--089e01161dea1df4e904e2ce4742
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Per =D8yvind Karlsen <[email protected]>w=
rote:

> 2013/7/31 Matthew Dawkins <[email protected]>
>
>> Well virtually providing glib2-devel =3D %{EVRD} was incorrect as well.
>>
> Why?
>
Why not glibX-devel or glibN-devel or glibPOK-devel?


>
>> And there is still a cross arch provides left, but not really preferred =
I
>> guess by many.
>> %{_lib}glib2.0-devel =3D %{EVRD}
>>
> That won't give same name on different archs and is btw. also redundant a=
s
> it's the exact same as provided from it's package name.
>
No it doesn't give the same name, but the macronized name is the same.
Ie Conflicts: %{_lib}glib2.0-devel < 1:2.36.3-2:2013.0

So, still I don't see what the problem is? Are you just trying to split
hairs or are you actually going to provide a proper solution?


>
> --
> Regards,
> Per =D8yvind
>

--089e01161dea1df4e904e2ce4742
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote">On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Per =D8yvind Karlsen <span dir=3D"=
ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank">proyvind@g=
mail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">2013/7/3=
1 Matthew Dawkins <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]=
m" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;</span><br>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im"><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-lef=
t:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>Well virtually providing glib2-devel =3D %{=
EVRD} was incorrect as well.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>=
<div>Why?=A0</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Why not glibX-devel o=
r glibN-devel or glibPOK-devel?<br>
=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"=
ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im=
"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;borde=
r-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><br></div>And there is still a cross arch p=
rovides left, but not really preferred I guess by many.<br></div>%{_lib}gli=
b2.0-devel =3D %{EVRD}<br></div></div></blockquote></div><div>That won&#39;=
t give same name on different archs and is btw. also redundant as it&#39;s =
the exact same as provided from it&#39;s package name. <br>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div>No it doesn&#39;t give the same n=
ame, but the macronized name is the same.<br></div><div>Ie Conflicts: %{_li=
b}glib2.0-devel &lt; 1:2.36.3-2:2013.0</div><div><br></div><div>So, still I=
 don&#39;t see what the problem is? Are you just trying to split hairs or a=
re you actually going to provide a proper solution?<br>
=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"=
ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">
<div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Regards,</div><div>Per =D8yvind</div></div=
></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>

--089e01161dea1df4e904e2ce4742--