Re: [OM Cooker] Separate qa mailing list, why?!?!

Blackcrack Moondrake <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:09:47 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 02.08.2013 15:57, schrieb Rapha=C3=ABl Jadot:
> Le 02/08/2013 13:42, Michael Scherer a =C3=A9crit :
>> So you should have very good reasons to have such private lists in the
>> first place. And "noise prevention" is not one of those reasons. For
>> this, there is moderation.
> Unless the moderated people create much more noise by crossposting and
> moaning about censorship :)
it's funny to do you notice (and hopefully learn) it...
Where have you been there, where the censorship initializer has with the=20
moderation filter,
I hear nor your words reverberate "on the next Mailing list mus it be an=20
moderations possibility in any case
( do you remember, in the old Mailinglist !! )
Where we had a heated debate, where you didn't like it.. in the old=20
Mailinglist ..
You ,Rapha=C3=ABl Jadot , was the initiator if this filters and moderator=
=20
possibility !

i don't forget this ! and i it calls to everyone again if need be !
>
> About om-qa, I don't understand what is the problem
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-qa-openmandriva.org
> "This is a private list, which means that the list of members is not
> available to non-members." but you can subscribe
>
> http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-qa-openmandriva.org/
> And archives are public.
>
> It seems a very common configuration to me... What do I miss?
>
and I know, you're like pushing others for your wish to.. i have noticed=20
this in the between time get/know also  ...
That it does not fall back on you .. i have noticed that too.. if can=20
falling back negative for you ..

Blacky