Re: New printer-config tool
Reinout van Schouwen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Organization | Huygens Institute |
| Message-ID | <1219996870.5731.15.camel@localhost> |
Hi! (Oliver said:) > > PS.: By the way: I liekd printerdrake better... Please file bugs about specific things you don't like / regressions against printerdrake with system-config-printer! (Tiago said:) > I've suggested to put the po files in our svn soft, but there were > complains about it. > So someone suggested (and I agreed) to help on translating directly in > fedora's translation system, so in the next version of > system-config-printer we (and all other distros) will have the > translation ok. Yes, I was the one complaining (on this very list!) and who suggested to work on the translation using Fedora's translation infrastructure. > But one problem still remains, that we have some strings (21, actually) > that the upstream system-config-printer does not have, and they need to > be translated. > We really need to find a way to translate them before the next release. > I've created a custom pot file only with our strings. I can upload it to > our svn, and every system-config-printer release merge our po files with > the upstream. > What do you think? I agree that these 21 strings should be translated, assuming they're not already translated in current Printerdrake or somewhere else. If they're not going to be pushed upstream for whatever reason, we have to find a different solution. Currently I don't have a better suggestion than yours, so please go ahead. It could be useful to add a fake string in our .po directing translators to the Fedora site to complete their translation. regards, -- Reinout van Schouwen