Re: Translations workflow
Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 19 May 2011 09:11:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 08:00 +0100, Zé a écrit : > 2011/5/19 Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>: > > Le jeudi 19 mai 2011 à 01:01 +0100, Zé a écrit : > >> 2011/5/17 Catalin Florin RUSSEN <cfrussen-/[email protected]>: > >> > JP, I could not express it better! > >> >> First I think that Transifex has to be the main source for translations > >> >> because translations will be submited there > >> > Yes, I agree. > >> >> So basically what I propose is simple : > >> >> translator -> Transifex -> svn -> package -> distrib > >> > Just perfect! > >> >> I said in some other mail, submitting new strings in svn and not in > >> >> Transifex (and the opposite) will diverge the svn and Transifex and > >> >> then, the merge of the two will be painful. > >> > I'll even agree to delete commit rights on SVN for translators and that > >> > everyone stick to Transifex. If someone likes to work offline, no problem! > >> > He/she will download the file from Tx, translate it offline and then upload > >> > it back on Tx! Then let's Tx do the commit job. > >> > >> I really dont like this option, i would like to be able to comit > >> translations in svn and not be forced at all to use transifex, this > >> way i think it still needed to sync transifex with svn, so that all > >> changes commited in svn can be synced in transifex and vice-versa. > > > > Hello, > > > > Technically it is not possible to work that way. Even if there is > > regular sync beetween the svn and Transifex the loss of translations > > risk will be high. > > > > Why don't you want to use Transifex ? > Thats simply more work when it can be easily done locally. > > When users are already overloaded with work, why create even more? > I really dont get that thinking way... > If you prefer to work with po file directly you can do it with transifex too Instead of svn co, svn ci it will be tx pull, tx push (cf http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/client/index.html) > >> > Now, I read something about an administration interface where the > >> > coordinators can validate which translations are to be committed by the > >> > daily script. This is very useful when you have to integrate new translators > >> > and validate their skills. So, when we can expect this? > >> > >> I just hope you dont force users to just use transifex that simply not > >> a good policy. > >> > >> > Best regards, > >> > Florin Catalin RUSSEN > >> > Mandriva Romanian Translation Team > >> > > > > > > > >