Re: Translations workflow
Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 19 May 2011 13:27:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le mardi 17 mai 2011 à 12:43 +0100, Catalin Florin RUSSEN a écrit : > JP, I could not express it better! > > > > First I think that Transifex has to be the main source for > translations > > because translations will be submited there > > > Yes, I agree. > > > > So basically what I propose is simple : > > translator -> Transifex -> svn -> package -> distrib > > > Just perfect! > > > > I said in some other mail, submitting new strings in svn and not in > > Transifex (and the opposite) will diverge the svn and Transifex and > > then, the merge of the two will be painful. > > > I'll even agree to delete commit rights on SVN for translators and > that everyone stick to Transifex. If someone likes to work offline, no > problem! He/she will download the file from Tx, translate it offline > and then upload it back on Tx! Then let's Tx do the commit job. > Yes. I may add that you can download po files from the web interface but also with the transifex command line tool > > Now, I read something about an administration interface where the > coordinators can validate which translations are to be committed by > the daily script. This is very useful when you have to integrate new > translators and validate their skills. So, when we can expect this? > Yes there will be some validation interface (see file attached). This interface will be improved in the future Code is working and available here https://github.com/eonpatapon/transifex-submissions It needs some polishing and testing, but it works. So if we agree on this workflow it can be setup soon JP > > Best regards, > Florin Catalin RUSSEN > Mandriva Romanian Translation Team >
validation.png
(image/png, 51.5 KB) - not displayed