Re: Translations workflow

Jean-Philippe Braun <jpbraun-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Thu, 19 May 2011 13:27:45 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.mandrake.cooker.internationalization
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le mardi 17 mai 2011 à 12:43 +0100, Catalin Florin RUSSEN a écrit :
> JP, I could not express it better!
> 
> 
> > First I think that Transifex has to be the main source for
> translations
> > because translations will be submited there
> 
> 
> Yes, I agree.
> 
> 
> > So basically what I propose is simple :
> > translator -> Transifex -> svn -> package -> distrib
> 
> 
> Just perfect!
> 
> 
> > I said in some other mail, submitting new strings in svn and not in
> > Transifex (and the opposite) will diverge the svn and Transifex and
> > then, the merge of the two will be painful.
> 
> 
> I'll even agree to delete commit rights on SVN for translators and
> that everyone stick to Transifex. If someone likes to work offline, no
> problem! He/she will download the file from Tx, translate it offline
> and then upload it back on Tx! Then let's Tx do the commit job.
> 
Yes. I may add that you can download po files from the web interface but
also with the transifex command line tool

> 
> Now, I read something about an administration interface where the
> coordinators can validate which translations are to be committed by
> the daily script. This is very useful when you have to integrate new
> translators and validate their skills. So, when we can expect this?
> 

Yes there will be some validation interface (see file attached). This
interface will be improved in the future

Code is working and available here
https://github.com/eonpatapon/transifex-submissions

It needs some polishing and testing, but it works. So if we agree on
this workflow it can be setup soon

JP

> 
> Best regards,
> Florin Catalin RUSSEN
> Mandriva Romanian Translation Team
>
validation.png (image/png, 51.5 KB) - not displayed