Re: Not such a smooth upgrade to 2011... Help?
Jim Beard <jdbeard-kTz99GpLsC/[email protected]> Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:01:09 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.expert |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/22/2011 12:26 PM, David Guntner wrote:
> [davidg@janet ~]$ rpm -qa|egrep kernel
> kernel-firmware-20100217-1mnb2
> kernel-desktop-2.6.33.7-2mnb-1-1mnb2
> kernel-firmware-extra-20100429-2mnb2
> kernel-desktop-devel-2.6.33.7-2mnb-1-1mnb2
********
> lib64kplatokernel7-2.2.2-1mdv2010.1
********
> kernel-desktop-latest-2.6.38.7-1
> kernel-desktop-2.6.38.7-1mnb2-1-1
> kernel-desktop-devel-latest-2.6.38.7-1
> kernel-desktop-devel-2.6.38.7-1mnb2-1-1
What is a "platokernel"? I have a feeling that this my be
triggering (as dependencies) the list of kernels that the
installer wants to provide. You might try removing that, and see
if it makes a difference.
You later mention that you are using xfs and that may be a
problem. Basically, the xfs module has to be in the initrd image
used to boot, not just out on disk somewhere waiting to be loaded.
Dave Hodgins' instructions to deal with this are:
The /boot/initrd-??? file needs to be recreated
with the correct module. To do this, boot from an install
cd/dvd, mount the root filesystem and run the following ...
mount --bind /proc $RootMountPoint/proc -o ro
mount --bind /sys $RootMountPoint/sys -o ro
mount --bind /dev $RootMountPoint/dev -o ro
chroot $RootMountPoint
mkinitrd -f /boot/initrd-$version.img $version
Note that after booting from the install disk, you have to select
"rescue system" or some such. Also, mkinitrd on a 2011 system
will use dracut to create the initrd, while mkinitrd-mkinitrd
will use the traditional mkinitrd to create it.
initrd-$version.img $version should look something like
initrd-3.1.0-rc8-1.1-desktop.img 3.1.0-rc8-1.1-desktop
Adjust as needed for the kernel you are creating the initrd for.
Cheers!
jim b.
--
UNIX is not user unfriendly; it merely
expects users to be computer-friendly.