RE: [Security Firewall] Florins Firewall
"Dewey Straughn" <[email protected]> Wed, 3 Aug 2005 19:29:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.security.firewall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
UNSUBSCRIBE REMOVE QUIT DRAMA ________________________________ From: security-firewall-owner-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected] [mailto:security-firewall-owner-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Ansley Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 7:13 PM To: security-firewall-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected] Subject: [Security Firewall] Florins Firewall Answering my own questions - this must be bad :) Sorry guys, I forgot this was discussed at some length on Thu Jan 30, 2003 at 02:22:58AM. Which you (Vincent Dean) wrote: <snip> AFAIK, there are not two versions of MNF. There isn't the "commercial" version and the "freebie" version. They are both one and the same. What you get with purchasing MNF is support (ie. phone support), priority updates, a manual, pressed CDs, etc. This isn't crippled software. It's exactly what you would get if you didn't pay for it... which you haven't. You don't get a manual, you don't get pressed CDs, you don't get phone support. You don't get access to the private FTP server. You have *exactly* what a commercial entity would have, should they have paid for it. The software is the same. The web interface is the same. *Everything* is the same. The difference is, you don't get the manuals, support, etc. <snip> Maybe that's where everyone thought that MNF was free? My 3.14159265 cents worth :) ________________________________ From: Glen Ansley Sent: Thu 4/08/2005 10:56 To: security-firewall-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected] Subject: RE: [Security Firewall] Florins Firewall OK, I'll bite :) SNF WAS free but the automatic web - front end upgrade option was not released with the "Free" version (and you didn't get official support from Mandrake). I believe it's documented in this list somewhere (about SNF) and USED to be documented on Mandrakes site. I will endeavour to dig up the relevant posts if I can be bothered later on :) - To prempt your question, yes, I have kept ALL posts since I joined this Mailing List! :) A quick scan showed that it was lightly refered as free on Thu, 29/01/2003 @ 10:41:26AM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed Jan 29, 2003 at 10:41:26AM -0800, Patrick Usher wrote: > Seems silly for people to complain about the service > for a free product.... but Oh well. No doubt. > Thanx for the link V.... very helpful. You're welcome. <snip> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------- Please correct me if I'm wrong but, this was to be the same for what was the successor to SNF (now MNF). ________________________________ From: security-firewall-owner-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected] on behalf of Vincent Danen Sent: Thu 4/08/2005 09:00 To: security-firewall-4qZELD6FgxheH41UXmfQsti2O/[email protected] Subject: Re: [Security Firewall] Florins Firewall On 3-Aug-05, at 2:14 PM, Repairman wrote: >> Huh? How do you figure we're taking a Microsoft route? I'm >> completely lost. Did we threaten to sue anyone? Are we telling you >> to stop? Are we asking you to pay a fee to fork it? Absolutely >> not! I asked for one simple thing and as a result some of you people >> have utterly lost all common sense! Comparing my asking you to move >> discussion to another list to Microsoft tactics? Excuse me? That's >> the most insane thing I think I've possibly ever heard! Don't you >> think you're over-reacting a little bit? >> > > The "Microsoft route" reffered to is that in the beginning of MS, > they did everything they could to give information to the > programmers and end users about their O/S. (A pre-Opensource way of > doing business). Unlike Apple, there was no red tape or hoops you > had to jump through. And they became the dominate O/S for this > reason. Now they are worse than Apple ever was. > > We helped take Mandrake out of bankrupsy and back on it's feet. I'm > not going to list everything that I personally have done, but now > they have decided to abandon what worked to get them there. > > Sounds like the MS route to me. I still don't get it. Not once was MNF ever to be given away for free. SNF wasn't, MNF8.2 wasn't, what made everyone think that MNF2 was any different. We haven't abandoned anything, we haven't done anything sneaky, we haven't robbed you of anything. We did exactly what we set out to do which was to create an enterprise firewall product. Nothing has changed on our end. Your perception of things seems to have changed over time, but I don't understand why. Did I miss something? Was everyone told that MNF2 was supposed to be free when the betas started rolling and then we snatched it away and went back on our word? -- "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import" {FEE30AD4 : 7F6C A60C 06C2 4811 FA1C A2BC 2EBC 5E32 FEE3 0AD4} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are intended only for the designated recipients. Superior IT Solutions prohibits use, distribution or transmittal by or to an unintended recipient without Superior IT Solution's express written approval. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this email and notify Superior IT Solutions ([email protected]) This message (And any attachment) has been scanned by F-Secure and Norton Anti-Virus before leaving our mail server. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------