Re: [Security Firewall] Re: MNF Licence

Florin

Given your understanding of the Mandrake development process, would you 
expect the first 3 SRPMS
below to contain the same source code?



Nigel Tingle wrote:

> I think you meant the 10.0 mirror.
>
> My concern is that I have no way of knowing whether the MNF2 package 
> is the same as the 10.0 one.
>
> Take for example the SRPMS for apache2 from the recent advisory.  
> There are different rpms for the
> different OS:
>
>fde6b2d1a9fea0cb99d965b1cc431de6  10.0/SRPMS/apache2-2.0.48-6.9.100mdk.src.rpm
>
>49e85703438cbe2e91a6c9cdf114b68c  corporate/3.0/SRPMS/apache2-2.0.48-6.9.C30mdk.src.rpm
>
>e23874e9cec97aa3f720d00fe9694619  mnf/2.0/SRPMS/apache2-2.0.48-6.9.M20mdk.src.rpm
>
>d661143590371366ed74be65d5e425ad  10.2/SRPMS/apache2-mod_ssl-2.0.53-8.1.102mdk.src.rpm
>
>59099063cd9ce08dd4919047a3fabbea  10.1/SRPMS/apache2-mod_ssl-2.0.50-4.2.101mdk.src.rpm
>
>
> Three of those are 2.0.48-6.9 based (10.0, corporate and mnf).  But I 
> have no way of knowing whether they
> contain the same code. It seems odd that they would go to the trouble 
> of maintaining different source trees if
> they were the same.
>
>>  
>>