Re: [Security-Discuss] hopefully it's cleaned up

On May 27, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:

>> On May 27, 2004, at 8:31 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Who's stats?
>
> Classification Accuracy
> Emails classified: 	1,358
> Classification errors: 	22
> Accuracy: 	98.37%																																														
>
> (Last Reset: Mon May 17 19:22:01 2004)
>
> That is around 1.5% less accurate than usual!  But then having recently
> re-set, the problem is showing a much greater influence than it should.
> No problem, of course.  POPFile keeps me very  happy with its
> spam/virus classification.

Ahhhh...  ok, I have something similar here (SpamSieve)... doesn't do 
viruses tho, although they get tagged as spam.  It's actually quite 
scary...

Filtered Mail
6850 Good Messages
10979 Spam Messages (62%)

SpamSieve Accuracy
23 False Positives
45 False Negatives (66%)
99.6% Correct

Corpus
282 Good Messages
656 Spam Messages (70%)
60051 Total Words

Showing Statistics Since
3/26/04 3:34 PM

I hate spam.. =(

-- 
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7  66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}