Re: [Security-Discuss] zlib

On Saturday 12 February 2005 09:35 pm, Charlie Brooks wrote:
> With all due respect, I have never understood why someone who represents
> an organization would choose to respond in this fashion. A much better
> response, IMHO, would be:
>
> The answer to your question can be found in the archives this list.
> The URL is <http://mandrake/archive-of-this-list>.
> The topic was discussed and addressed a few weeks ago.
>
> This does two things:
>
> 1. informs the questioner that there is an archive of this mailing list.
> 2. indicates that one might choose to search the archive before asking a
> question,
> 3. Actually provides the questioner with information they can use.
>
> Yeah, I know you're busy, etc. etc. But simply creating a template
> response similar to the above would provide better and more long-lasting
> results.
>
> Charlie

So, in short.
The zlib 1.2.1 in mdk10.1 is safe right? Because it's already been patched?

-- 
Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | http://linux2.arinet.org
07:10:40 up 5 min, Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (Official) for i586 
public key: https://www.arinet.org/fajar-pub.key

____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________