Re: [Security-Discuss] Firefox Backport Request to 10.1
Vincent Danen <vdanen-4qZELD6FgxhWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.security.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16-May-05, at 3:20 PM, Dieter Schütze wrote:
> You are total right and i understand. I am also very angrily about the
> way of updates from mandriva. You can read this in the clamav thread.
> No security about the main trees on the LE2005 and nothing for the
> official version (10.1). The LE2005 is only a community Version not
> for
> production.
> And you are right no firefox update for 10.1 and this is very
> important.
>
> I don't no what is going on on mandriva side these are many steps
> back.
>
> There is nothing to forgive about this discussion this is one way to
> change the situation.
>
> I hope we get a reaction here form mandriva side.
Well, that's a little insulting.
You're angry because we didn't release an update for a component that
is unsupported, which is specified in policy and has been policy for
at least 5 years? Shame on you for being angry about something like
that.
The clamav thread. When did that start? Yesterday? Today? Good
Lord man, we're not super heros here that can turn back the clock or
work at the speed of light. You whine about an older version in
clamav less than 24 hours ago and you expect the update to be out
already? I think you need a reality check.
LE2005 a community version and not for production? I think you
misread the press release. LE2005 is fully supported for the same
length of time that 10.1 is. LE2005 is functionally the equivalent
of 10.2. LE2005 is an official product being sold by MandrivaStore.
LE2005 is called "Limited Edition" not because it's some crap we
decided to pass the time with but because it will have limited
*distribution* meaning boxed sets will not be sold in stores.
In other words, you're way off base here and I'm highly insulted.
You're also providing misleading information to other people on the
list and that is certainly not appreciated; not by me and certainly
not by the other users who might be actually seriously listening to
this drivel.
You wanted a reaction? You got one. I don't think it's what you
expected, but maybe next time you should do a little research first
and then maybe throw a dash of common sense in there as well.
(FWIW, you'll get your clamav update... it may not be today, but it
will be sometime this week)
--
"lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FEE30AD4 : 7F6C A60C 06C2 4811 FA1C A2BC 2EBC 5E32 FEE3 0AD4}
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed