Re: [Security-Discuss] Firefox Backport Request to 10.1

All i can do is laugh at this entire thread.  
  
Hip hip & cheerio  
  
p.s i want vincent's babies :D :D :D  
  
On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:03:31 -0600, Vincent Danen wrote  
> On 16-May-05, at 5:16 PM, Dieter Schütze wrote:  
>   
> >> The clamav thread.  When did that start?  Yesterday?  Today?  Good  
> >> Lord man, we're not super heros here that can turn back the clock or  
> >> work at the speed of light.  You whine about an older version in  
> >> clamav less than 24 hours ago and you expect the update to be out  
> >> already?  I think you need a reality check.  
> >>  
> >  
> > Sorry !!!  
> > It is not my job to look about very important patches.  
>   
> Huh?  
>   
> > clamav 0.84 with this important patches are out since 29th of April.  
> > And now we have clamav 0.85  
>   
> Right, and 0.83 came with LE2005 and no one told me (ie. the    
> maintainer) that an update for clamav was required.  So it hasn't    
> been updated.  Unless the maintainer tells me an update is required    
> (be it functional or bugfix), or unless there is a security problem    
> with it, I won't know about it.  
>   
> The last clamav update we put out was in January, and that was based    
> on the maintainer's request (it was 0.81).  I wasn't aware there is a    
> security hole in clamav prior to 0.85.  Is there?  Do you have a CVE    
> name handy, because I sure don't.  You're just looking for the    
> "latest and greatest", no?  
>   
> > I am buying the Distribution packages and now you want i do the    
> > work for  
> > you ?  
>   
> Yes, please.  Could you build the packages for me?  
>   
> Seriously... what have I asked you to do?  Other than providing a CVE    
> name (just now) I haven't asked you for squat.  What are you talking    
> about doing the work for you?  
>   
> > I think you need a reality check.  
>   
> Huh?  We must be in two different worlds.  I'm stuck here in the real    
> world, and you're traipsing off in fantasy land.  
>   
> Seriously man... nothing you've said so far makes *any* sense.  
>   
> > If that the way of mandriva to be gone around with customers ?  
> > I think no, or ?  
>   
> I don't get you at all.  
>   
> Could you maybe rephrase that last one?  I understood what you were    
> talking about (more or less) in the rest of your message (although I    
> think you're out to lunch), but this I didn't get at all.  
>   
> >> LE2005 a community version and not for production?  I think you  
> >> misread the press release.  LE2005 is fully supported for the same  
> >> length of time that 10.1 is.  LE2005 is functionally the equivalent  
> >> of 10.2.  LE2005 is an official product being sold by MandrivaStore.  
> >> LE2005 is called "Limited Edition" not because it's some crap we  
> >> decided to pass the time with but because it will have limited  
> >> *distribution* meaning boxed sets will not be sold in stores.  
> >>  
> >>  
> > If it so ? Then is the fault with clamav much harder that i think.  
> > Because in the main tree are clamav 0.83 and no updates.  
>   
> You lost me.  
>   
> Oh, wait.  I get it.  You think we have to bring every single piece    
> of software we ship to the latest version when it comes out, right?     
> That's what it sounds like to me.  Dandy idea.  Let's get on that.  
>   
> Oh.  Wait.  It's called cooker and it's existed for years.  
>   
> > PS: I do not think that am good basis for me at my customers    
> > mandriva to  
> > be introduced  
>   
> Ummm... lost me again.  
>   
> --   
> "lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"  
> {FEE30AD4 : 7F6C A60C 06C2 4811 FA1C  A2BC 2EBC 5E32 FEE3 0AD4}

____________________________________________________
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com
____________________________________________________