Re: [Security-Discuss] Mount issues in LE2005-Club - Security Issue
Albert Whale <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:07:47 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.security.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | ABS Computer Technology, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
After receiving multiple complaints about my report. I am Confirming the fact that Mount is Broken on LE2005. Thank you for you wonderful support. Now that we have all taken this as a Newbie Report from a 20 year veteran, can we please fix this problem? Antonio Galea wrote: >On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:04:24AM -0400, Albert Whale wrote: > > >>>Have you actually tested if the partition is really mounted with the >>>exec option then? In my experience, the mount command does not seem to >>>always show the used mount options (e.g. I remember having seen this >>>already with uid and gid options for smbfs mounts, on another distro, >>>even though they are correctly working). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Wow, You're kidding me? >> >> >> > >No, he's not: he's SUGGESTING you to actually TEST the thing: a brilliant >idea, btw. > > > >>I did prove that the reported FS Mounting is insecure. >> >> > >Sorry to contradict you, but you did not mention any proof. > > > >>How's this for additional proof >> >>more /proc/filesystems >>... >>You'll notice that /tmp is not one of these listed. >> >> >> > >Well, if you look closely you'll also notice that no partition is mentioned >at all :) > >This 'proof' has no relation whatsoever with your problem: you are showing us >the list of filesystem supported by your kernel. > > > >>But seriously, if the mount command fails to use the mount options, and >>then fails to report the options, then what would you say would be a >>valid test of the mounted filesystem? An infected (or hacked) server? >> >> >> > >Pardon me if I repeat the concept once more: up to now, you only know that >mount fails to REPORT the options, not that it fails to APPLY them... before >whining, please do check! > >I would assume that if you are tightening the security of your server with a >'noexec' option on /tmp you should know what a valid test might be: if you do >not, you will have a hell of a hard time if a hacker ever finds you out :-) > >A suggestion: try what happens with 'cp /bin/bash /tmp; /tmp/bash'... > >Cheers, > >Ant9000 > >PS: don't want to patronize you, but you should definitely lookup 'newbie' > and 'troll' on your preferred jargon file... your response makes you look > like a good candidate for both. Next time think before rushing to the > keyboard, please. > > > > -- Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP Sr. Security, Network, Risk Assessment and Systems Consultant ------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS Computer Technology, Inc. - www.ABS-CompTech.com SPAM Zapper - No-JunkMail.com - Spam-Zapper.com - SPAM Stops Here. President of the Pittsburgh InfraGard Alliance
message.footer
(text/plain, 232 B)
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandriva? Go to http://store.mandriva.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrivaclub.com ____________________________________________________