Re: [Security-Discuss] 2006 su problem
Matt Parker <matt-GI5F06Pch7ob0QgIrC/[email protected]> Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:54:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.mandrake.security.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19:12, Vincent Danen wrote: > Out of curiosity... what is it about msec that you actually like/need? > I find msec to be more trouble than it's worth. Frankly, I like the > idea of the various reports it sends, but I really can't stand how it > monkeys with files behind your back (and changing configs is even > worse). Do you actually find msec "fixing" things is reliable and worth > it? I love it. For example, one of my web facing servers runs sshd and is open to everyone (so long as they have a username/password). Given that I have all these users (and some of them run Windows which is vulnerable to having keyloggers installed) it helps me sleep at night knowing I'll get a report in the morning if any config files have changed and that they will have been changed back for me. I'm not much of a hands on administrator (I have other things to do) and I like msec looking after my boxes for me. Granted it can be a pain to set up, but it didn't take long to work out how to configure it - even running at the highest security level below paranoid (can't remember which number that is) - once I'd RTFM. Matt
message.footer
(text/plain, 232 B)
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from Mandriva? Go to http://store.mandriva.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrivaclub.com ____________________________________________________