Re: Want to help with 2.6.2x kernel and LiveKiosk
Michael Bunk <mb-bdq14YP6qtTFlEURE6xjZ1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:22:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.morphix.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Paul, Brendan and Alex,
> As I understand it, cloop is deprecated in favour
> of squashfs, and unionfs
Paul, do you mean in general or in morphix?
Brendan Sleight schrieb:
> On 05/10/2007, Alex de Landgraaf wrote:
>> No, the new basemod template doesn't work, I've still to add the unionfs
>> and cloop packages compiled against the kernel in the repository.
>
>> I'll see what I can do over the weekend. Last time I tried it cloop and
>> unionfs weren't compiling against the kernel.
>
> This just popped up in another mailing list:-
>
> "If you are interested in using unionfs with 2.6.22 kernels I have made
> some patches.
>
> I'm running thin clients with unionfs+squashfs with 2.6.22-2-486 without
> problems."
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-live-devel/2007-October/002327.html
At least the compiled packages are not for 2.6.22-5 ... I didn't get
time to build my own.
But I worked on the cloop kernel module: In
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=436090 a new version of
it is pointed out that has not entered unstable yet. Since I didn't get
along with Klaus Knopper's debian/rules I copied compressed_loop.c
and compressed_loop.h from his new
package into the unpacked Debian source package and rebuilt... the
result should be a brand new morphix-suitable cloop kernel module
package, which I didn't get to try out yet...
Did you make any progress?
Michael
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/