Re: bootsplash

Alex de Landgraaf <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:28:35 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.morphix.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Paul,

Paul wrote:
> I'll build a set of 2.6.23 kernel packages (what other *-modules-2.6.23 
> packages do we need ?) tonight with bootsplash & unionfs patched in. 

Cool, note that a modified cloop might be required. The (patched) source
is in the repository. Give me a prod when you're done so I can add these
to the repository.

> Given 
> time, also investigate the effort required to use bootsplash with 2.6.24. In 
> the meantime, any thoughts on splashy ?

I wouldn't mind including both for the time being, but I agree that
splashy is the only option for the long run. Not having to patch the
kernel will be nice, and development for splashy seems to be more
active. Splashy and bootsplash use the same bootoption, so I'll have to
script around that, but that's a minor deal.

cheers,

Alex


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHc8SjQeuQA5TF/UsRAj9lAJ9qr20pZXUQ1JPLFy2in4hs4w7lyQCcD08d
FmjwD0KfIM/ffakYXUj5TAM=
=Jull
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/