Re: Error with BaseModule plus BareX - init.sh bombs

Alex de Landgraaf wrote:

>
>The problem is that BareX in itself doesn't start X, it only includes X. Yup,
>doesn't make much sense, but it was intended for people to have a starting
>point from which to build their own modules (add a windowmanager, their own
>packages etc). It does have a bug in the init script, but that doesn't change
>much...
>
>Think we'll have to get serious about mainmod/livecd-autobuilding instead :)
>
And, indeed, that's what I want to do (start with a Bare X, and add one 
X app with no window manager).  It is not clear what the next step is.