Re: reply target
Bart De Schuymer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 07 August 2003 23:59, Grzegorz Borowiak wrote: > OK, I'll try to check if -p ARP was specified, but by now I think I'll > leave --arp-opcode not required, because I don't think checking it by > --arp-opcode is faster. And there is a clash between ebt_arp.h files in > old and new patch, which does not emerge if reply target checks opcode on > its own. Yes, you're right, --arp-opcode would be slower. cheers, Bart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01