Re: Re: ebt_inat

Bart De Schuymer <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:22:35 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tuesday 16 September 2003 21:28, Grzegorz Borowiak wrote:
> - it should not be any sign considered by bash as special,
> From the remaining _ is the best, beacuse:
> - it lays maximally down and makes think of DROP
> - graphically, the 00:0a:de:ad:be:ef=_ looks like a curve going down to
> hit the floor

Hmm, yes, it does :) OK.

> I just committed the corrected version of the ebt_among. I didn't have
> time for ebt_isnat and ebt_idnat today.

OK. I'll have a look at them.

cheers,
Bart



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf