Re: Any luck with Redhat Enterprise kernel?
"Ian S. Nelson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | StillSecure |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I figured it out. It's the 2.6 style routing structure. I was setting the MTU the wrong way. I don't know how they maintain that stuff... Bart De Schuymer wrote: >On Friday 25 June 2004 02:31, Ian S. Nelson wrote: > > >>I'm getting panics in ip_refrag with it now. It's stock RHEL >>2.4.21-09 with ebtables-5 from 2.4.24 on it. >> >> > >Sorry, I only support my patches vs a clean kernel. > >cheers, >Bart > > > > -- . . . *Ian S. Nelson Senior Software Engineer* *StillSecure* 303-381-3813 Direct 303-381-3881 Fax www.stillsecure.com <http://www.stillsecure.com> /Reducing your risk has never been this easy./ . . . /The information transmitted is intended only for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Review or other use of this information by persons other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you've received this in error, please contact the sender and delete from any computer. /
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 827 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBQNx8GDhjWF4fiUUSAQKmIw/9Gf1dNRbyB7fqA4yu8RgkQ79F8BPcK+Wy YmDSFyJFgfoVgh3mmrTnetAAtYx7ALzO6lwac/1E2bukmR5SXR3U1jcHRO7fA79e o54g+dK4+WZNHjORIMhSoMMFdku5LOK1tEqNLLgugQ93QntQdkNpQki1qO/Rvnw8 pQtHheZF5JRl/SWq8KiOovwG4r/Wy+yojRNf5N/bRAZc8wpJ1DqxIzlEs2BVDFG9 aVGl1TagWn6kQKoR+SKOw8zauWd1QIZZ5UzEPApaBExePd1vlLb6iJUhaXPMPLKJ XMUCFFUvmPZmxN4SQ8cNKYWhKS8ZyYk3nkZk+57NMF+SyHSkS6+EkhdIaOoY1qPm Um1yJcRNb9IqSfLN8KVVqHIaaguARxp7lh2e9BEZ5EJgutWhdb3R7h85ggFI6n3q OL59orDvkmroMvabwaYoz5d+hfhKaeLmNHm1Ad6uTyyWIWC8HdOlkXxYEcYtIYee rgu7wmV7bmZE/qQcODggWELyf6omQu5H6jtliGhbwWc0cEACu0zxPXyB09+8bHHm eQtvmcyrmJfCKnqsks8d21aMyW+JLbnqzmJtf0wro4Xsaf+c0zSuE6V2bCo4WLGl FgGJ97U4Eqd8dOHokj13YE6i/in5ZLToB6RMKNuWRBX1K1zrvp/P6tgfdMwE5mLX j60EC6f5cSk= =fw+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----