Re: Re: [Bridge] ebtables and bridge performance

Nick Fedchik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel
Organization UkrSat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Lennert Buytenhek,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 15:03:33, you wrote:
LB> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:24:26PM -0800, me athome wrote:

>> I have two related questions:
>> 1) After applying:
>> ebtables-v2.0.003_vs_2.4.20.diff.txt and
>> bridge-nf-0.0.10-against-2.4.20.diff.txt the
>> performance under the same exact conditions drops to
>> under 100Mbps

>> (without any actual filtering configured). Why?
???

LB> You are probably using connection tracking.
Hmm, as for me, it's very important info.
I keep my attention on this moment, because my previous perfomance
tests on "clean" bridge has good results with compare to Cisco
Catalyst 3550.
See http://www.fedchik.org.ua/linux/bridge/

-- 
Best regards,
Nick Fedchik FNM3-RIPE  mailto:[email protected]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.