Re: [PATCH] don't answer gratuitous arp

Op vr, 23-03-2007 te 09:36 +0200, schreef Ivan Vladimirov:
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > On 22.03.2007 21:36, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi Patrick,
> >>
> >> The ebtables arpreply target should not answer gratuitous arp's as this
> >> has no use and can give rise to problems when client machines
> >> send gratuitous arp requests to check for ip conflicts, as reported by
> >> Ivan Vladimirov.
> >> The attached patch resolves this.
> >>     
> >
> > Please don't apply this patch! It causes more problems than it solves.
> > Before the patch, a client machine has a chance to find out that its
> > IP conflicts with one handled by the arpreply target. After the patch,
> > there will still be an IP conflict, but it is now impossible to find
> > that out for the affected machine.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Carl-Daniel
> >   
> You are wrong about ip conflict with machine  having arpreply on it . In
> case when client machine conflicts with server having arpreply target
> arpreply wont answer  but the network stack while answer so your consern
> is pointless ...

Can you explain yourself further, I tend to agree with Carl-Daniel's
comment. Are you sure there is no configuration that will suffer from
applying this patch?
I'll add the --arp-gratuitous option to the ebtables arp match this
weekend. That way we don't break anything and checking on gratuitous arp
packets can be done elsewhere too.

cheers,
Bart



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV