Re: Bugs in ebtables-restore extension presence checks and other, suggestion for /proc interface
Lech Perczak <leon_master-wYtBgQxc//[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bart De Schuymer wrote: > > The attached patch to the userspace program should solve things. > The /proc changes will have to wait until later. I'm on holiday for 2 > weeks starting saturday. I'll make a new release tomorrow with this fix > unless you report another problem... > > cheers, > > Bart > Your patch works for me. At the time Gentoo script uses manual config, but maybe we can simply fall back for managing every of 3 tables. I've modified ebtables-save script for getting tables names from command-line, and then falling back to grepping /proc/modules stuff. I think the /proc interface will be just nice, but you don't need to hurry with it. Patch and files are available on http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189315. I'd like to hear what Peter thinks about the thing, but I think we're pretty done by now. Thanks. Best regards, Lech ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/