Re: Question about among-dst
David Nolan <vitroth+-D+Gtc/[email protected]> Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:18:38 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--On Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:03:49 -0300 Bartman <bartmanxxi-/[email protected]> wrote: > How long could be a line using ebtables among-dst option? You're limited only by the the fact that ebtables takes the mac address list on the command line, and there is a maximum command line length. Experimentation showed that we could put around 7K mac addresses in a single rule, but in our production system we're limiting it to 5K addresses per rule. Small numbers of multiple rules seems to be a neglible performance hit. We're running around 23K addresses in our system right now, so thats 5 among rules. (We're using among-src, but that should be functionally equivelant.) This is in the wireless captive portal system at Carnegie Mellon University, providing mac address "authentication" for the campus wide wireless network. See this page for more info: http://acs-wiki.andrew.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Netreg/AuthBridge > Why it doesn't work with targets other than ACCEPT or DROP? That I don't know the answer to... > Is it safe to put a lot of firewall lines into the kernel with > atomic-save? In fact, thats the point. If you build the ruleset in the kernel then you can't update it without having moments when the ruleset is not complete. We're pushing the rules mentioned above into the kernel via the atomic operations. -David Nolan Network Software Designer Computing Services Carnegie Mellon University ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV