Re: Dual-Homed/Triple-Subnet Bridge Challenge
"Vincent Callanan" <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:14:26 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge.ebtables.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | RVJ Callanan & Associates |
| Message-ID | <001801c86db3$de8bda20$0301a8c0@HPN01X> |
> About the only thing that the client computer can to to > effect what is > or is not sent to it (aside from doing some very nasty things > with ARP) > is to enable Spanning Tree Protocol and mis-configure it and or allow > loops in the network. If you want to have a discussion about > STP, just > say the word. ooh, I'll leave that for another day...my aging brain is already overloaded :) > In short, they do not. The Linux (or what ever) networking sniffing > utilities only see the traffic that comes to the NIC its > self. That is > why if you want to sniff a switched network you either need > to put a Hub > in-line or use a SPAN / Mirror port on a switch. This way, all the > traffic makes it to the Linux (or what ever) system's NIC in > promiscuous > mode. ah yes! I do recall reading something about this in the past. My neural networks are obviously misconfigured :) All has been revealed! This very satisfied "customer" will report back in due course with postscript. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/