Re: [PATCH iproute2] bridge:fdb: Protocol field in bridge fdb
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.bridge,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 03:11:45 +0000 Mrinmoy Ghosh <[email protected]> wrote: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > index 085bb139..1ff9dbee 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h > @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ enum { > #define RTPROT_OSPF 188 /* OSPF Routes */ > #define RTPROT_RIP 189 /* RIP Routes */ > #define RTPROT_EIGRP 192 /* EIGRP Routes */ > +#define RTPROT_HW 193 /* HW Generated Routes */ > > /* rtm_scope > > diff --git a/lib/rt_names.c b/lib/rt_names.c > index 7dc194b1..b9bc1b50 100644 > --- a/lib/rt_names.c > +++ b/lib/rt_names.c > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static char *rtnl_rtprot_tab[256] = { > [RTPROT_OSPF] = "ospf", > [RTPROT_RIP] = "rip", > [RTPROT_EIGRP] = "eigrp", > + [RTPROT_HW] = "hw", > }; > > struct tabhash { This is iproute2-next material. Where is the kernel patch for this? Iproute headers are synced from kernel headers. If you add new RTPROT entry also need new line into etc/iproute2/rt_protos