Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 5/5] selftests/net: add offload checking test for virtual interface

Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network.bridge,gmane.linux.network
Message-ID <aL6soY3gEj-LIovi@fedora>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:36:21AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > The esp-hw-offload is fixed on netdevsim
> > 
> > # ethtool -k eni0np1 | grep -i esp-hw-offload
> > esp-hw-offload: on [fixed]
> > 
> > There is no way to disable it.
> 
> I don't think this is intentional. nsim_ipsec_init only adds
> NSIM_ESP_FEATURES to ->features but not to ->hw_features, but I think
> it was just forgotten. I added a few in 494bd83bb519 ("netdevsim: add
> more hw_features"), extending nsim_ipsec_init (and nsim_macsec_init
> since I made the same mistake) to also add features to ->hw_features
> would make sense to me.

This could be done in another patch.

> 
> > After we add the netdevsim to bond,
> > the bond also shows "esp-hw-offload off" as the flag is inherit
> > in dev->hw_enc_features, not dev->features.
> 
> Did you mean dev->hw_features?

No, the xfrm_features in patch 01 updates dev->hw_enc_features, not
dev->hw_features. Do you think if we should update dev->hw_features in the
patch?

> 
> > It looks the only way to check if bond dev->hw_enc_features has NETIF_F_HW_ESP
> > is try set xfrm offload. As
> 
> Was this test meant to check hw_enc_features?
> 
> To check hw_enc_features, I think the only way would be sending GSO
> packets, since it's only used in those situations.

Oh.. That would make the test complex. Can we ignore this test first?

BTW, I'm a bit lost in the callbacks.gso_segment. e.g.

esp4_gso_segment
 - xfrm4_outer_mode_gso_segment
   - xfrm4_transport_gso_segment
     - ops->callbacks.gso_segment

But who calls esp4_gso_segment? I can't find where the features is assigned.

> 
> 
> > static int xfrm_api_check(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> 
> But this doesn't get called when creating a new xfrm state. Trying to
> create a new offloaded xfrm state doesn't look at any of the
> netdev->*features (and we can't change that behavior anymore).
> 
> xfrm_api_check only gets called for NETDEV_REGISTER/NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE
> to validate whether the netdevice is set up correctly.

Thanks for correcting me.

Regards
Hangbin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.