Re: Should ICMP echo responses be 'bound to the interface' of the incoming ICMP echo request?
David Miller <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network.general,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 03:02:53 +0200 (CEST) > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, andrei radulescu-banu wrote: > >> But here's a problem: the kernel supports only up to 256 route >> domains, and I'd like to be able to use more interfaces than that, >> physical plus virtual. > > Sounds like that 256 limit should be the thing to be looked into then. That limit was removed ages ago. I notice that when discussions occur on this list, a lot of misinformation gets spread around. The problem is that the actual networking developers don't read this list, they read [email protected] instead. Maybe it's time that we just get rid of linux-net because it's been nothing but problematic as users search for information on it and very few people on that list are knowledgable enough to even consider answering. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html