Re: HTB performance improvement

Andy Furniss <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network.routing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
gypsy wrote:
> gypsy wrote:
>>> tc qdisc add dev eth0.2 root handle 1: htb
>>> tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb  rate 100000000 ceil
>>> 100000000 burst 1000000 quantum 1600
>>> tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb prio 1 rate
>>> 70000000 ceil 70000000 burst 1000000 quantum 1600
>>> tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb prio 2 rate
>>> 10000000 ceil 10000000 burst 1000000 quantum 1600
>>> tc class add dev eth0.2 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb prio 3 rate
>>> 10000000 ceil 10000000 burst 1000000 quantum 1600
> 
> I just noticed that you're trying to shape "aliases".  You can't.  You
> must shape eth0 because you can't shape eth0.2.  I'm just repeating what
> I've heard/read, so do your own research.  But I bet you a quarter I'm
> right :)
> --

Could be vlans - in which case OP could try adding child b/pfifos to the 
leafs and use the limit parameter to specify buffer length.

HTB and HFSC both pick up default queuelengths from the device, but it's 
0 on vlans (they use 2 or 3 packet pfifos IIRC in this case).

I do notice there are no drops in the stats though, but it's still worth 
specifying queue length and type in the script.

Andy.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.