Re: List fault?

On 05/04/2011 09:06 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/04/11 12:03, Radu Oprisan wrote:
>> I can set-up another mailing list in the morning (8 PM now, EEST).
>>  Think we can get somebody else to join?
>
> I'm not opposed to a new mailing list in and of its self.
>
> However I think that this list (LARTC) is well known and documented 
> all over the place.  So even if we migrate elsewhere, there will still 
> be people that stumble on to this list.
>
> I've personally noticed, for the last couple of years, that this list 
> would be *EXTREMELY* delayed (as in weeks to months) for some unknown 
> reason.  -  As I look at headers of some of the recent messages, I see 
> that a message sat in the queue on the server for multiple months 
> before being delivered to my mail server.
>
> Seeing that now messages seem to be flowing in a timely manner, I'd 
> suggest that we give this list a week to a month probation to see if 
> it has straightened up it's act.
>
> I'd also like a comment from the list maintainer or a moderator in his 
> / her stead.
>
> Other than the above concern, I'll support moving to a new mailing 
> list as long as there are messages to this list (so that they can be 
> found in archives) indicating the move.
>
>

True. We shall wait then for more information. On the other hand, I will 
try to contact LARTC in order to ask them for permission to take over 
this one.