Re: tc question about ingress bandwidth splitting

Mandi! Philip Prindeville
  In chel di` si favelave...

> > 1st:  Address the fact that you can only effectively rate limit what you send.  So, change the problem so that you rate limit what is sent to your router.  I would do this by having the incoming connection go into a Network Namespace and a new virtual connection to the main part of the router.  This Network Namespace can then easily rate limit what it sends to the main part of the router, on a single interface.
> This is the same problem that ifb solves, right?
> I’m not sure I want to assume that Namespaces are available in all scenarios.

Interesting... i've found:

	https://blog.scottlowe.org/2013/09/04/introducing-linux-network-namespaces/

and i've not understood how can i 'link' phisical interfaces with
vethX.
Using bond? But after that, i need to use ebtales?


ifbX interfaces are very limited by not having connection tracking,
having some 'real' interfaces would be a must!

-- 
dott. Marco Gaiarin				        GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
  Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia''          http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
  Polo FVG   -   Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078   -   San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
  marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it   t +39-0434-842711   f +39-0434-842797

		Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
      http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
	(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)