Re: Status of the LARTC project and of this list

The overarching point, from my perspective, is that this list is not a "pro=
ject" at all, but a clearinghouse for configuration of routing & traffic co=
ntrol on the platform=2E

As such, sunsetting it would be counterproductive=2E

Anyway, that's the view from this tiny (and very quiet) corner, rudely top=
-posted (sorry about that)=2E

Cheers, all=2E

On October 31, 2023 4:53:38 PM EDT, Rich Brown <richb=2Ehanover@gmail=2Eco=
m> wrote:
>I don't have a clear sense of the lartc=2Eorg project status, but I wante=
d to comment on a possible update to its website=2E
>
>A while back, I ported the website to use Bootstrap3 to give a modern loo=
k while retaining virtually all the text on the site=2E It is now posted at=
: lartc=2Erichb-hanover=2Ecom
>
>The github repo for the updated site is at: https://github=2Ecom/richb-ha=
nover/lartc-redesign
>
>The project is free to use this repo or not=2E
>
>Best regards,
>
>Rich Brown
>richb=2Ehanover@gmail=2Ecom
>
>> On Oct 31, 2023, at 12:57 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfou=
ndation=2Eorg> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hello, all:
>>=20
>> We're in the process of migrating vger lists to new infrastructure and,=
 as
>> such, we are reviewing all lists that appear inactive to gauge if we ne=
ed to
>> consider sunsetting them=2E
>>=20
>> The status of the LARTC project is not very clear to me, which is why I=
'm
>> reaching out to list subscribers=2E From the outset, things aren't look=
ing very
>> alive:
>>=20
>> - the last update to lartc=2Eorg is from 2012
>> - the last update to lartc=2Egit is also from 2012
>>=20
>> However, there are still a few questions being asked on the list, which=
 is now
>> archived here: https://lore=2Ekernel=2Eorg/lartc
>>=20
>> Does anyone have a good picture of the status of the project? Is it sti=
ll
>> relevant?
>>=20
>> -K
>
>

--=20
Lewis