Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] pull request for net-next: batman-adv 2026-07-28
Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:08:01 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.org.freifunk.batman,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/26 12:38 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Tuesday, 4 August 2026 12:19:13 CEST Paolo Abeni wrote: >> On 7/28/26 3:39 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: >>> Dear net maintainers, >>> >>> here is a minor bugfix/cleanup pull request of batman-adv to go into net-next. >> >> Note that it's preferred to avoid fixes and stable tags for changes >> targeting the net-next tree. If the fixes are really minor, both could >> possibly safely dropped. If there is some real problem behind, such >> changes should instead target the net tree. >> >> Can you easily rebase your tree and adjust the PR vs the above? > > I have a different statement from Linus: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjt1NiKOdyAMz_DT7NmZ++SizPOhRSi492ukdTnpDzHQw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org/T/#u > > This is why we started to not send out net.git fixes PRs for things which > aren't highly critical or for Linus' "just merged for this release commits" > late in the development process. I actually think netdev preference is consistent with Linus'ask: move the "fixlet" to net-next. The additional twist is the ask to drop the stable and fixes tag (otherwise stable will be flooded, too). PR are a bit apart from plain series, hence my initial questions WRT how problematic would be stripping such tags and how impactful are actually the things addressed in the first 6 patches. /P