Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 3/3] geneve: Support per-netns netdev unregistration.
Ilya Maximets <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 17:35:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/26 5:24 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 6:47 AM Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 7/31/26 6:45 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: >>> geneve_exit_rtnl_net() iterates geneve devices whose sockets >>> are in the dying netns and queues them for destruction. >>> >>> So the devices may reside in different netns. >>> >>> Let's use unregister_netdevice_queue_net() to support per-netns >>> device unregistration. >>> >>> list_del() is changed to list_del_init() to avoid queueing the >>> same device twice. >>> >>> Even after geneve_exit_rtnl_net() queues a cross-netns geneve >>> device, geneve_dellink() can be called concurrently for it. >>> In such a case, __rtnl_net_unlock() will perform the unregistration. >>> >>> Note that geneve uses register_pernet_subsys() instead of _device(), >>> so default_device_exit_batch() guarantees that the async per-netns >>> works are flushed before ->exit(). >>> >>> Tested: >>> >>> 1. Create geneve device across two netns. >>> >>> # ip netns add ns1 >>> # ip netns add ns2 >>> # ip -n ns1 link add geneve0 link-netns ns2 type geneve external >>> >>> 2. Run bpftrace to check that geneve_uninit() is called between >>> ->exit_rtnl() and ->exit(). >>> >>> # bpftrace -e '#include <linux/netdevice.h> >>> kprobe:geneve_uninit { >>> $dev = (struct net_device *)arg0; >>> printf("PID: %d | DEV: %s%s\n", pid, $dev->name, kstack()); >>> } >>> kprobe:geneve_exit_rtnl_net, >>> kprobe:geneve_exit_net { >>> printf("PID: %d%s\n", pid, kstack()); >>> }' >>> >>> 3. Remove the netns where the geneve socket resides >>> >>> # ip netns del ns2 >>> >>> Now, we can see geneve0 is unregistered by per-netns work >>> instead of cleanup_net() and it finishes before ->exit() to >>> avoid WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gn->sock_list)) there. >>> >>> PID: 571 >>> geneve_exit_rtnl_net+5 >>> ops_undo_list+702 >>> cleanup_net+1122 >>> process_scheduled_works+2538 >>> ... >>> PID: 1047 | DEV: geneve0 >>> geneve_uninit+5 >>> unregister_netdevice_many_notify+7129 >>> unregister_netdevice_many_net+1050 >>> rtnl_net_work_func+136 >>> process_scheduled_works+2538 >>> ... >>> PID: 571 >>> geneve_exit_net+5 >>> ops_undo_list+1064 >>> cleanup_net+1122 >>> process_scheduled_works+2538 >>> ... >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> drivers/net/geneve.c | 12 +++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c >>> index f456a85dca77..a6a8978e3b81 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c >>> @@ -2502,12 +2502,13 @@ static int geneve_changelink(struct net_device *dev, struct nlattr *tb[], >>> return err; >>> } >>> >>> -static void __geneve_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) >>> +static void __geneve_dellink(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev, >>> + struct list_head *head) >>> { >>> struct geneve_dev *geneve = netdev_priv(dev); >>> >>> - list_del(&geneve->next); >>> - unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head); >>> + list_del_init(&geneve->next); >>> + unregister_netdevice_queue_net(net, dev, head); >>> } >>> >>> static void geneve_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) >>> @@ -2518,7 +2519,8 @@ static void geneve_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head) >>> gn = net_generic(geneve->net, geneve_net_id); >>> >>> mutex_lock(&gn->lock); >>> - __geneve_dellink(dev, head); >>> + if (!list_empty(&geneve->next)) >>> + __geneve_dellink(dev_net(dev), dev, head); >> >> Sashiko noted that the lockdep chain between dev->lock, utn->loc and >> gn->lock is not trivial, possibly a documentation follow-up would be useful >> >>> mutex_unlock(&gn->lock); >>> } >>> >>> @@ -2754,7 +2756,7 @@ static void __net_exit geneve_exit_rtnl_net(struct net *net, >>> mutex_lock(&gn->lock); >>> >>> list_for_each_entry_safe(geneve, next, &gn->geneve_list, next) >>> - __geneve_dellink(geneve->dev, dev_to_kill); >>> + __geneve_dellink(net, geneve->dev, dev_to_kill); >> >> Here sashiko foresees some problem with CONFIG_DEBUG_NET_SMALL_RTNL >> before full conversion to per netns lock even of ovs. Just more >> follow-up, I guess. > > Is it Sashiko-nipa output ? > I can't find the comments from patchwork. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/[email protected]/ > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > > btw, I was hoping this series would land upstream so that > I don't need to care about OVS :) > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ FWIW, I have the non-RFC version of this set prepared. I can post it, if that helps. Best regards, Ilya Maximets.