Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] net: dsa: realtek: rtl83xx: add support for enabling supplies
Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 07:40:29PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 5:56 PM Ahmad Fatoum <[email protected]> wrote: > > [Andrew says] > > > static inline int __must_check clk_bulk_get_optional(struct device *dev, > > > static inline int __must_check devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(struct device *dev, > > > static inline int __must_check devm_clk_bulk_get_optional_enable(struct device *dev, > > > > > > If clk has them, maybe regulators should as well? > > > > clk and regulator have different interpretations of _optional > > when encountering a non-existent resource: > > > > clk_get return error > > clk_get_optional return NULL > > regulator_get return handle dummy regulator > > regulator_get_optional return error code > > > > So devm_regulator_bulk_get() is already the "optional" variant, but it causes > > all existing users to get dummy supply warnings. > > So is this a big problem? Does it cause any other issues than > dmesg noise? As tested with local sashiko setup, new warnings for existing system without good reason will be reported as regression, so it will be blocker for net-next inclusion. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |