From: Yalagada Pavan Kumar <[email protected]>
When reading the EEPROM address length, e100_eeprom_read() can return
an invalid length. This value is then used as a shift count when
calculating eeprom_wc, resulting in a shift-out-of-bounds UBSAN warning.
Stop EEPROM address probing if the detected address length exceeds
the initial address length to prevent addr_len from underflowing.
Validate addr_len after reading it from the EEPROM in both
e100_eeprom_load() and e100_eeprom_save(), and return -EIO
if the value is zero or greater than 8.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e0abb1d45ac291ebebeb
Signed-off-by: Yalagada Pavan Kumar <[email protected]>
---
v3:
- Prevent addr_len underflow during EEPROM probing.
- Use BIT() and explicitly cast the result to u16 when assigning eeprom_wc.
- Update the commit message and subject to reflect the scope of the fix.
- verify the UBSAN failure with syzkaller reproducer before the fix
and its absence after the fix.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
- Return -EIO instead of -EINVAL for an invalid EEPROM address length.
- Validate addr_len in e100_eeprom_save() as well.
- Drop the unnecessary 1U change in the shift.
- Update the commit message.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
index 464dc2d6cdb5..5165f1d3c98f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
@@ -746,10 +746,12 @@ static __le16 e100_eeprom_read(struct nic *nic, u16 *addr_len, u16 addr)
if (!(ctrl & eedo) && i > 16) {
u16 len = i - 16;
- if (len > *addr_len)
+ if (len > *addr_len) {
*addr_len = 0;
- else
- *addr_len -= len;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ *addr_len -= len;
i = 17;
}
@@ -771,14 +773,14 @@ static int e100_eeprom_load(struct nic *nic)
/* Try reading with an 8-bit addr len to discover actual addr len */
e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, 0);
- if (!addr_len || addr_len >= 16) {
+ if (!addr_len || addr_len > 8) {
netif_err(nic, probe, nic->netdev,
"Invalid EEPROM address length %u\n",
addr_len);
return -EIO;
}
- nic->eeprom_wc = 1 << addr_len;
+ nic->eeprom_wc = (u16)BIT(addr_len);
for (addr = 0; addr < nic->eeprom_wc; addr++) {
nic->eeprom[addr] = e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, addr);
@@ -805,14 +807,14 @@ static int e100_eeprom_save(struct nic *nic, u16 start, u16 count)
/* Try reading with an 8-bit addr len to discover actual addr len */
e100_eeprom_read(nic, &addr_len, 0);
- if (!addr_len || addr_len >= 16) {
+ if (!addr_len || addr_len > 8) {
netif_err(nic, probe, nic->netdev,
"Invalid EEPROM address length %u\n",
addr_len);
return -EIO;
}
- nic->eeprom_wc = 1 << addr_len;
+ nic->eeprom_wc = (u16)BIT(addr_len);
if (start + count >= nic->eeprom_wc)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.