[PATCH 05/10] xfrm: avoid lock inversion in nat keepalive work

Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Zihan Xi <[email protected]>

nat_keepalive_work() walks the state table while xfrm_state_walk()
holds net->xfrm.xfrm_state_lock. Its callback then acquires x->lock,
which conflicts with the delete path taking the same locks in reverse
order via xfrm_state_delete() and __xfrm_state_delete(). This creates
an AB-BA deadlock that is reported by lockdep when a NAT keepalive
worker races with SA deletion.

Fix this by splitting the keepalive walk into two phases. First,
collect the candidate states while the walk holds xfrm_state_lock and
take a reference on each state. Then, after the walk completes, process
each collected state and acquire x->lock without nesting it under
xfrm_state_lock.

Fixes: f531d13bdfe3 ("xfrm: support sending NAT keepalives in ESP in UDP states")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Vega <[email protected]>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.4
Signed-off-by: Zihan Xi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ren Wei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_nat_keepalive.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_nat_keepalive.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_nat_keepalive.c
index eb1b6f67739e..8679c68c10a1 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_nat_keepalive.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_nat_keepalive.c
@@ -156,24 +156,51 @@ static void nat_keepalive_send(struct nat_keepalive *ka)
 }
 
 struct nat_keepalive_work_ctx {
+	struct list_head states;
 	time64_t next_run;
 	time64_t now;
 };
 
-static int nat_keepalive_work_single(struct xfrm_state *x, int count, void *ptr)
+struct nat_keepalive_state {
+	struct list_head list;
+	struct xfrm_state *x;
+};
+
+static int nat_keepalive_work_collect(struct xfrm_state *x, int count, void *ptr)
 {
 	struct nat_keepalive_work_ctx *ctx = ptr;
+	struct nat_keepalive_state *state;
+
+	if (!READ_ONCE(x->nat_keepalive_interval))
+		return 0;
+
+	state = kmalloc_obj(*state, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!state)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	xfrm_state_hold(x);
+	state->x = x;
+	list_add_tail(&state->list, &ctx->states);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void nat_keepalive_work_single(struct xfrm_state *x,
+				      struct nat_keepalive_work_ctx *ctx)
+{
 	bool send_keepalive = false;
 	struct nat_keepalive ka;
-	time64_t next_run;
+	time64_t next_run = 0;
 	u32 interval;
 	int delta;
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
+
+	if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
+		goto out;
+
 	interval = x->nat_keepalive_interval;
 	if (!interval)
-		return 0;
-
-	spin_lock(&x->lock);
+		goto out;
 
 	delta = (int)(ctx->now - x->lastused);
 	if (delta < interval) {
@@ -187,29 +214,41 @@ static int nat_keepalive_work_single(struct xfrm_state *x, int count, void *ptr)
 		send_keepalive = true;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+out:
+	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 
 	if (send_keepalive)
 		nat_keepalive_send(&ka);
 
-	if (!ctx->next_run || next_run < ctx->next_run)
+	if (next_run && (!ctx->next_run || next_run < ctx->next_run))
 		ctx->next_run = next_run;
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static void nat_keepalive_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+	struct nat_keepalive_state *state, *tmp;
 	struct nat_keepalive_work_ctx ctx;
 	struct xfrm_state_walk walk;
 	struct net *net;
+	int err;
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx.states);
 	ctx.next_run = 0;
 	ctx.now = ktime_get_real_seconds();
 
 	net = container_of(work, struct net, xfrm.nat_keepalive_work.work);
 	xfrm_state_walk_init(&walk, IPPROTO_ESP, NULL);
-	xfrm_state_walk(net, &walk, nat_keepalive_work_single, &ctx);
+	err = xfrm_state_walk(net, &walk, nat_keepalive_work_collect, &ctx);
 	xfrm_state_walk_done(&walk, net);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(state, tmp, &ctx.states, list) {
+		nat_keepalive_work_single(state->x, &ctx);
+		xfrm_state_put(state->x);
+		kfree(state);
+	}
+	if (err == -ENOMEM) {
+		schedule_delayed_work(&net->xfrm.nat_keepalive_work, 0);
+		return;
+	}
 	if (ctx.next_run)
 		schedule_delayed_work(&net->xfrm.nat_keepalive_work,
 				      (ctx.next_run - ctx.now) * HZ);
-- 
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.