Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] bonding: fix u32 overflow in compute_gap()

On 18/08/2026 14:06, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 18/08/2026 12:44, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 18/08/2026 11:47, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>>> From: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> The TLB load-tracking fields tx_bytes, load_history, load, and
>>> unbalanced_load are all u32. At sustained throughput above ~3.2 Gbit/s
>>> over the 10-second rebalance interval the byte counters wrap, causing
>>> compute_gap() to produce incorrect gap values and mis-select slaves.
>>> Such speeds are common on modern NICs under heavy traffic.
>>>
>>> Widen these fields to u64. Use u64_stats_sync to protect the per-cpu
>>> unbalanced_load_stats against tearing on 32-bit architectures, and
>>> div_u64() for the 64-bit divisions. The tx_bytes, load, and load_history
>>> are protected in spin_lock.
>>>
>>> Rework compute_gap() to use u64 arithmetic throughout. Return 0 when the
>>> speed is unknown or the slave is already overloaded.
>>>
>>> Detected by AI code review.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>>> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c  | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>   drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |  2 +-
>>>   include/net/bond_alb.h          |  9 ++++---
>>>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>>> index d54d834cf72b..659a77323444 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>>   #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>>>   #include <linux/netdevice.h>
>>>   #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>>> +#include <linux/ethtool.h>
>>>   #include <linux/pkt_sched.h>
>>>   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> @@ -74,8 +75,8 @@ static inline u8 _simple_hash(const u8 *hash_start, int hash_size)
>>>   static inline void tlb_init_table_entry(struct tlb_client_info *entry, int save_load)
>>>   {
>>>       if (save_load) {
>>> -        entry->load_history = 1 + entry->tx_bytes /
>>> -                      BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_INTERVAL;
>>> +        entry->load_history = 1 + div_u64(entry->tx_bytes,
>>> +                      BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_INTERVAL);
>>>           entry->tx_bytes = 0;
>>>       }
>>> @@ -158,25 +159,35 @@ static void tlb_deinitialize(struct bonding *bond)
>>>       spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
>>>   }
>>> -static long long compute_gap(struct slave *slave)
>>> +static u64 compute_gap(struct slave *slave)
>>>   {
>>> -    return (s64) (slave->speed << 20) - /* Convert to Megabit per sec */
>>> -           (s64) (SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load << 3); /* Bytes to bits */
>>> +    u32 raw_speed = READ_ONCE(slave->speed);
>>> +    u64 speed = (u64)raw_speed;
>>> +
>>> +    /* It's meaningless to compare gap on unknown speed NIC */
>>> +    if (raw_speed == (u32)SPEED_UNKNOWN)
>>> +        return 0;
>>> +
>>> +    /* skip slave which is over loaded */
>>> +    if ((speed << 20) <= (SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load << 3))
>>> +        return 0;
>>> +
>>> +    return (speed << 20) - /* Convert to Megabit per sec */
>>> +           (SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load << 3); /* Bytes to bits */
>>>   }
>>>   static struct slave *tlb_get_least_loaded_slave(struct bonding *bond)
>>>   {
>>>       struct slave *slave, *least_loaded;
>>>       struct list_head *iter;
>>> -    long long max_gap;
>>> +    u64 max_gap = 0;
>>>       least_loaded = NULL;
>>> -    max_gap = LLONG_MIN;
>>>       /* Find the slave with the largest gap */
>>>       bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
>>>           if (bond_slave_can_tx(slave)) {
>>> -            long long gap = compute_gap(slave);
>>> +            u64 gap = compute_gap(slave);
>>>               if (max_gap < gap) {
>>>                   least_loaded = slave;
>>> @@ -1344,8 +1355,14 @@ static netdev_tx_t bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
>>>       if (!tx_slave) {
>>>           /* unbalanced or unassigned, send through primary */
>>>           tx_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
>>> -        if (bond->params.tlb_dynamic_lb)
>>> -            this_cpu_add(bond_info->unbalanced_load->tx_bytes, skb->len);
>>> +        if (bond->params.tlb_dynamic_lb) {
>>> +            struct unbalanced_load_stats *pcpu_load;
>>> +
>>> +            pcpu_load = this_cpu_ptr(bond_info->unbalanced_load);
>>> +            u64_stats_update_begin(&pcpu_load->syncp);
>>> +            u64_stats_add(&pcpu_load->tx_bytes, skb->len);
>>> +            u64_stats_update_end(&pcpu_load->syncp);
>>
>> this still races with...
>>
>>> +        }
>>>       }
>>>       if (tx_slave && bond_slave_can_tx(tx_slave)) {
>>> @@ -1529,19 +1546,28 @@ netdev_tx_t bond_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev)
>>>       return bond_do_alb_xmit(skb, bond, tx_slave);
>>>   }
>>> -static u32 reset_unbalanced_load(struct alb_bond_info *bond_info)
>>> +static u64 reset_unbalanced_load(struct alb_bond_info *bond_info)
>>>   {
>>>       struct unbalanced_load_stats *p;
>>> -    u32 total_bytes = 0;
>>> +    u64 tx_bytes, total_bytes = 0;
>>> +    unsigned int start;
>>>       int i;
>>>       for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>>>           p = per_cpu_ptr(bond_info->unbalanced_load, i);
>>> -        total_bytes += READ_ONCE(p->tx_bytes);
>>> -        WRITE_ONCE(p->tx_bytes, 0);
>>> +        do {
>>> +            start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&p->syncp);
>>> +            tx_bytes = u64_stats_read(&p->tx_bytes);
>>> +        } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&p->syncp, start));
>>> +
>>> +        u64_stats_update_begin(&p->syncp);
>>> +        u64_stats_set(&p->tx_bytes, 0);
>>> +        u64_stats_update_end(&p->syncp);
>>
>> ... this here, as u64_stats_update_begin doesn't provide exclusive access, so writers
>> must do that themselves, so you can't be sure what value will end up, the zeroing
>> might not work at all and can get overwritten
>>
> 
> I meant - it doesn't improve on the current situation where it can also happen. :)
> 

Sorry for the multiple replies, but thinking about this - having multiple concurrent
writers could cause write tearing for 32-bit architectures (the monitor is a writer
and can write concurrently with tx) leading to invalid result.

>>> +
>>> +        total_bytes += tx_bytes;
>>>       }
>>> -    return total_bytes / BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_INTERVAL;
>>> +    return div_u64(total_bytes, BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_INTERVAL);
>>>   }
>>>   void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> index 9fb44e0031c8..4c4d9bf71e0c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>>> @@ -6495,7 +6495,7 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>>>       if (!bond->wq)
>>>           return -ENOMEM;
>>> -    bond->alb_info.unbalanced_load = alloc_percpu(struct unbalanced_load_stats);
>>> +    bond->alb_info.unbalanced_load = netdev_alloc_pcpu_stats(struct unbalanced_load_stats);
>>>       if (!bond->alb_info.unbalanced_load)
>>>           goto wq_out;
>>> diff --git a/include/net/bond_alb.h b/include/net/bond_alb.h
>>> index 3fabf4714dec..51c083c76115 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/bond_alb.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/bond_alb.h
>>> @@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ struct tlb_client_info {
>>>                    * packets to a Client that the Hash function
>>>                    * gave this entry index.
>>>                    */
>>> -    u32 tx_bytes;        /* Each Client accumulates the BytesTx that
>>> +    u64 tx_bytes;        /* Each Client accumulates the BytesTx that
>>>                    * were transmitted to it, and after each
>>>                    * CallBack the LoadHistory is divided
>>>                    * by the balance interval
>>>                    */
>>> -    u32 load_history;    /* This field contains the amount of Bytes
>>> +    u64 load_history;    /* This field contains the amount of Bytes
>>>                    * that were transmitted to this client by
>>>                    * the server on the previous balance
>>>                    * interval in Bps.
>>> @@ -118,13 +118,14 @@ struct tlb_slave_info {
>>>                * are the entries that were assigned to use this
>>>                * slave for transmit.
>>>                */
>>> -    u32 load;    /* Each slave sums the loadHistory of all clients
>>> +    u64 load;    /* Each slave sums the loadHistory of all clients
>>>                * assigned to it
>>>                */
>>>   };
>>>   struct unbalanced_load_stats {
>>> -    u32            tx_bytes;
>>> +    u64_stats_t        tx_bytes;
>>> +    struct u64_stats_sync    syncp;
>>>   };
>>>   struct alb_bond_info {
>>>
>>
>