Re: [PATCH 03/10] nfsd: serialize nfsd4_end_grace() with atomic test-and-set
"Chuck Lever" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.nfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, May 28, 2026, at 5:55 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > From: Chris Mason <[email protected]> > > nfsd4_end_grace() guards its drain path with a plain bool: > > if (nn->grace_ended) > return; > nn->grace_ended = true; > > The read and the write are independent, and nothing in struct > nfsd_net serializes them. At least two contexts can reach this > code with no lock held: > > laundromat path > laundry_wq kworker > nfs4_laundromat() > nfsd4_end_grace() > > RECLAIM_COMPLETE path > nfsd compound kthread > nfsd4_reclaim_complete() > inc_reclaim_complete() > nfsd4_end_grace() > > Both callers can observe grace_ended == false on different CPUs, > both store true, and both proceed into nfsd4_record_grace_done(), > which invokes the active client_tracking_ops->grace_done callback. > For tracking ops that drain reclaim_str_hashtbl (legacy_tracking_ops > via nfsd4_recdir_purge_old, and the cld v1+ ops via > nfsd4_cld_grace_done), grace_done calls nfs4_release_reclaim(), > which walks every bucket of reclaim_str_hashtbl with no lock and > calls nfs4_remove_reclaim_record() (list_del + kfree) on each > entry. Two concurrent walkers corrupt the list and double-free > every nfs4_client_reclaim. A concurrent nfsd4_find_reclaim_client() > iterating the same bucket reads through freed memory. > > A third call site exists in nfs4_state_start_net() on the > skip_grace startup path, but it runs under nfsd_mutex before any > client has connected and before the laundromat's first delayed > work fires, so it cannot race with the two callers above. > > Fix by replacing the read/write pair with try_cmpxchg() so exactly > one caller transitions grace_ended from false to true and proceeds > into the drain; the loser returns immediately. bool supports > 1-byte cmpxchg on all supported architectures, and no lock > ordering changes are needed. > > Fixes: 362063a595be ("nfsd: keep a tally of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations > when using nfsdcld") > Assisted-by: kres:claude-opus-4-7 > Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <[email protected]> > --- > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > index f4d12dbcf97b..dc4ac541436f 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c > @@ -7022,12 +7022,23 @@ nfsd4_renew(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct > nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, > static void > nfsd4_end_grace(struct nfsd_net *nn) > { > - /* do nothing if grace period already ended */ > - if (nn->grace_ended) > + bool expected = false; > + > + /* > + * nfsd4_end_grace() can be entered concurrently from the > + * laundromat workqueue and from an nfsd compound thread > + * handling RECLAIM_COMPLETE. Without serialization, both > + * callers can observe grace_ended==false and proceed into > + * nfsd4_record_grace_done(). For tracking ops whose > + * grace_done drains reclaim_str_hashtbl, that results in > + * list corruption and a double free of every > + * nfs4_client_reclaim entry. Use an atomic test-and-set so > + * exactly one caller proceeds. > + */ > + if (!try_cmpxchg(&nn->grace_ended, &expected, true)) > return; > > trace_nfsd_grace_complete(nn); > - nn->grace_ended = true; > /* > * If the server goes down again right now, an NFSv4 > * client will still be allowed to reclaim after it comes back up, > > -- > 2.54.0 Seems like the usual idiom for something like this is an atomic bit op. Perhaps try_cmpxchg on a boolean variable is not going to behave as you expect on every hardware platform. -- Chuck Lever