Re: [PATCH 0/2] tracing: Move trace_printk.h out of kernel.h
Yury Norov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.kbuild.devel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.rdma,gmane.linux.usb.general,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ajk0lT9P0SeuD94j@yury> |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 09:08:26AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 10:05:13 +0200 > "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There's been complaints about trace_printk() being defined in kernel.h as it > > > can increase the compilation time. As it is only used by some developers for > > > debugging purposes, it should not be in kernel.h causing lots of wasted CPU > > > cycles for those that do not ever care about it. > > > > Do we have a measurement of the increased compilation time ? > > I believe Yury does. I re-run compilation is a more strict environment, and the difference is negligible.