Re: [PATCH] NFS: invalidate i_blocks after COMMIT to fix stale block count on NFSv4
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/23/26 12:51 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2026-06-23 at 12:04 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote: > >> +cc [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) >> >> On 6/22/26 9:56 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2026-06-22 at 14:00 +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote: >>> >>>> NFSv4 COMMIT compound does not include GETATTR, and >>>> nfs4_commit_done_cb >>>> does not refresh inode attributes. Meanwhile, every WRITE marks >>>> NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS via nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc_locked. >>>> >>>> After COMMIT, i_blocks remains stale until the next stat() triggers a >>>> full revalidation. In writeback-heavy workloads where COMMITs happen >>>> without intervening stat() calls, the cached block count can stay >>>> indefinitely wrong. >>>> >>>> Mark NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS on successful COMMIT completion so that >>>> the >>>> next nfs_getattr requesting STATX_BLOCKS will issue a GETATTR with >>>> SPACE_USED, fetching the correct value from the server. >>>> >>>> This matches NFSv3 behavior where nfs3_commit_done already calls >>>> nfs_refresh_inode with the wcc_data post-op attributes. >>>> >>>> Reproduce with xfstests generic/694 on NFSv4.0 loopback: >>>> >>>> Server: >>>> mount /dev/vdc /data/test >>>> mount /dev/vdd /data/scratch >>>> exportfs -o insecure,rw,sync,no_root_squash,fsid=1 >>>> 127.0.0.1:/data/test >>>> exportfs -o insecure,rw,sync,no_root_squash,fsid=2 >>>> 127.0.0.1:/data/scratch >>>> >>>> Client: >>>> mount -t nfs -o vers=4.0 localhost:/data/test /mnt/test >>>> mount -t nfs -o vers=4.0 localhost:/data/scratch /mnt/scratch >>>> >>>> local.config: >>>> export TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS="-o vers=4.0" >>>> export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o vers=4.0" >>>> export FSTYP=nfs >>>> export TEST_DEV=localhost:/data/test >>>> export SCRATCH_DEV=localhost:/data/scratch >>>> export TEST_DIR=/mnt/test >>>> export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch >>>> >>>> This fixes xfstests generic/694. >>>> >>>> Assisted-by: Qoder:Qwen3.7-Max >>>> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <[jefflexu-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/[email protected]](mailto:jefflexu-KPsoFbNs7GizrGE5bRqYAgC/[email protected])> >>>> --- >>>> fs/nfs/write.c | 2 ++ >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c >>>> index d7c399763ad9..88c5c9f7434c 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c >>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c >>>> @@ -1851,6 +1851,8 @@ static void nfs_commit_release_pages(struct >>>> nfs_commit_data *data) >>>> /* Latency breaker */ >>>> cond_resched(); >>>> } >>>> + if (status >= 0) >>>> + nfs_set_cache_invalid(data->inode, >>>> NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS); >>>> >>>> nfs_init_cinfo(&cinfo, data->inode, data->dreq); >>>> nfs_commit_end(cinfo.mds); >>> >>> >>> That sounds like an XFS bug, not an NFS bug. COMMIT isn't changing the >>> data contents of the file: it is just ensuring that the existing data >>> is persisted onto disk. >>> >> >> >> Yes the underlying backend filesystem is indeed xfs. >> >> I retest it and can confirm that this failure is much likely >> reproducible on NFS upon XFS, while NFS upon EXT4 succeeds for 50 >> consecutive test runs. >> >> Beside XFS itself also passes the test. >> >> >> To be honest I'm not familiar with NFS, following is what AI concludes: >> >> ``` >> Root Cause Timing Sequence: NFSv4.0 Stale i_blocks After syncfs >> >> >> Client issues multiple UNSTABLE WRITEs — each WRITE compound includes >> a piggy-backed GETATTR that returns the server's current SPACE_USED. The >> client updates inode->i_blocks from the last completed WRITE's post-op >> attributes. >> >> Server-side delayed allocation — the export's local filesystem >> (ext4/xfs) uses delayed allocation. Metadata blocks (indirect blocks / >> extent tree nodes) are not yet allocated during most WRITE handling; >> they materialize only when the local fs performs its own writeback. >> >> Last WRITE completes before server metadata writeback (~80% >> probability in user's environment) — the final GETATTR returns >> SPACE_USED = 8388608 (data only, no metadata block). Client caches >> i_blocks = 8388608. >> >> syncfs triggers COMMIT — nfs_write_inode(WB_SYNC_ALL) calls >> __nfs_commit_inode, which sends a COMMIT RPC to the server. >> Server executes vfs_fsync_range — this forces the local fs writeback, >> which now allocates the metadata block. Server's true SPACE_USED becomes >> 8388616 (+8 sectors = 4 KiB). >> >> COMMIT response carries no file attributes — per RFC 7530 §16.3.3, >> COMMIT4resok contains only a write verifier. The XDR decoder >> (nfs4_xdr_dec_commit) never calls decode_getfattr. >> >> nfs_commit_release_pages performs no attribute invalidation — it >> neither sends a follow-up GETATTR nor marks NFS_INO_INVALID_BLOCKS. The >> stale cached value persists. >> >> Subsequent stat returns stale i_blocks — cache_validity is clean, so >> nfs_getattr serves the cached value 8388608 without revalidation. >> >> After cycle_mount, fresh GETATTR returns 8388616 — mismatch detected, >> test fails. >> ``` >> > > > I agree with your AI that this may indeed be a consequence of XFS's delayed allocation feature. However that hardly changes the fact that it would be a violation of the POSIX rules for how write(), fsync() and stat() are supposed to work in this situation. > > My point is that I fail to see why we should degrade the performance of the generic NFS client in order to address a bug in one of the back end filesystems (in this case XFS) being exported. > Understand. Just have no idea which is the proper way to fix this. -- Thanks, Jingbo