Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: Fix duplicate fsnotify access events for iterator READs
Amir Goldstein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOQ4uxiVHcu2BUZejjS+YPuyyFWcsMwkpd+GxoZfxE_WKumY_g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 6:21 PM Chuck Lever <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2026, at 6:21 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > (1) In this series > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected]/ > > we intentionally moved the permission hook outside > > of the splice iterators because we wanted to avoid calling them > > with freeze protection held and also there were some duplicate calls > > for this work. > > > > At this point in time, the fsnotify_{access,modify} post hooks are > > usually called > > from the same context as the matching permission/security hooks. > > It doesn't have to be this way, but it's a good mental model IMO. > > > > (2) emitting many READ events from an iterator instead of one event for > > the user's READ request is more noisy and serves no purpose to users. > > In most cases (but not always) those events could be merged, but at the > > cost of futile CPU cycles. > > > > From a quick inspection of the code, it looks like: > > - fsnotify_access() is missing in vfs_splice_read() > > - the naming convention for splice_ do_splice_ vfs_splice_ is a horror > > - we could make the low level splice_direct_to_actor() static and possibly > > rename it to splice_direct_to_actor_sd() or something > > - we could export vfs_splice_direct_to_actor() for nfsd which wraps > > splice_direct_to_actor() with permission hook and fsnotify_access > > IIUC this last bullet seems like clean layering to me. Do > you want to propose a patch or shall I? Be my guest. Maybe Ameer will want to post it for v2. Thanks, Amir.