| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.ngpt.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
If NGPT is faster than NPTL why you decided to stop the development?
Just because NPTL is already incorporated in glibc?
It is possible that you can contribute to NPTL to achieve the
same (or better) performance than NGPT has today?
What is the best model, 1:1 or M:N?
You are stopped or are you active at this time? Are you working on
threads today or the project was cancelled?
Thanks,
Andre Goddard
Computer Science Student
at Federal University of Minas Gerais,
Brazil